DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1987 Ford Tempo vs 1987 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tempo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 90
FordMakeAudi
TempoModel90
1987Model year1987
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 90
—0–100 km/h9,8 s
160 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2307 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
102 HPPower115 HP
176 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 90
4490 mmLength4393 mm
1735 mmWidth1695 mm
1340 mmHeight1397 mm
1180 KgWeight1110 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1987 Ford Tempo and 1987 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…