1987 • Audi
90
Audi 90 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1987Overall Score61.25/100
1987 Audi 90 vs 1987 Ford Tempo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Ford
Tempo
Ford Tempo 2.3 (102 Hp) 1987Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Tempo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 90SpecificationFord Tempo
AudiMakeFord
90ModelTempo
1987Model year1987
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 90SpecificationFord Tempo
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2307 cc
115 HPPower102 HP
172 NmTorque176 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 90SpecificationFord Tempo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 90SpecificationFord Tempo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 90SpecificationFord Tempo
4393 mmLength4490 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1397 mmHeight1340 mm
1110 KgWeight1180 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1987 Audi 90 and 1987 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…