1992 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.8 V6 (141 Hp) 1992Overall Score61.5/100
1992 Ford Taurus vs 1992 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 4.3 Vogue LSE (202 Hp) 1992Overall Score61.25/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
FordMakeLand Rover
TaurusModelRange Rover
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement4273 cc
141 HPPower202 HP
292 NmTorque149 Nm
6Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption21,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,7 lt
—Average consumption15,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/70 R14Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4877 mmLength4449 mm
1808 mmWidth1818 mm
1374 mmHeight1790 mm
1420 KgWeight2075 Kg
2692 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Ford Taurus and 1992 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…