DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1992 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelTaurus
1992Model year1992
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4273 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
202 HPPower141 HP
149 NmTorque292 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank61 lt
21,6 ltUrban consumption—
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
15,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/80 R16Tyre size205/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4449 mmLength4877 mm
1818 mmWidth1808 mm
1790 mmHeight1374 mm
2075 KgWeight1420 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2692 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Land Rover Range Rover and 1992 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…