1998 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.4 V8 32V (238 Hp) 1998Overall Score75.75/100
1998 Ford Taurus vs 1998 Chrysler 300M Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Chrysler
300M
Chrysler 300M 3.5 i V6 24V (252 Hp) 1998Overall Score74.75/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationChrysler 300M
FordMakeChrysler
TaurusModel300M
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationChrysler 300M
—0–100 km/h7,8 s
225 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3392 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
238 HPPower252 HP
312 NmTorque340 Nm
8Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationChrysler 300M
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationChrysler 300M
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationChrysler 300M
5016 mmLength5000 mm
1854 mmWidth1920 mm
1400 mmHeight1420 mm
1560 KgWeight1630 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Ford Taurus and 1998 Chrysler 300M approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…