DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Jaguar XJ vs 1998 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeFord
XJModelTaurus
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3248 ccEngine displacement3392 cc
237 HPPower238 HP
310 NmTorque312 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank61 lt
17,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/60 R16 98WTyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5023 mmLength5016 mm
1799 mmWidth1854 mm
1345 mmHeight1400 mm
1780 KgWeight1560 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Jaguar XJ and 1998 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…