DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Taurus vs 2000 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
TaurusModelGalant
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
210 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
200 HPPower197 HP
271 NmTorque278 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5016 mmLength4770 mm
1854 mmWidth1740 mm
1400 mmHeight1415 mm
1522 KgWeight1520 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2623 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Taurus and 2000 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…