DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Taurus vs 1999 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChrysler
TaurusModelConcorde
1999Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
210 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
200 HPPower203 HP
271 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5016 mmLength5310 mm
1854 mmWidth1900 mm
1400 mmHeight1420 mm
1522 KgWeight1570 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Taurus and 1999 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…