1995 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 (147 Hp) 1995Overall Score65.25/100
1995 Ford Taurus vs 1995 Mitsubishi Sigma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mitsubishi
Sigma
Mitsubishi Sigma 3.0 V6 (177 Hp) 1995Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
FordMakeMitsubishi
TaurusModelSigma
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
180 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
147 HPPower177 HP
230 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Sigma
5070 mmLength4750 mm
1854 mmWidth1775 mm
1463 mmHeight1435 mm
1579 KgWeight1468 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Ford Taurus and 1995 Mitsubishi Sigma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…