DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Chevrolet Omega vs 1995 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
OmegaModelTaurus
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2969 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
165 HPPower147 HP
230 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15 VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4768 mmLength5070 mm
1760 mmWidth1854 mm
1454 mmHeight1463 mm
1497 KgWeight1579 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Chevrolet Omega and 1995 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…