DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Taurus vs 1995 FAW Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFAW
TaurusModelAudi 100
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2596 cc
147 HPPower150 HP
230 NmTorque225 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4785 mm
1854 mmWidth1777 mm
1463 mmHeight1431 mm
1579 KgWeight1400 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Taurus and 1995 FAW Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…