DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Taurus vs 1995 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChrysler
TaurusModelConcorde
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement3301 cc
147 HPPower163 HP
230 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength5152 mm
1854 mmWidth1890 mm
1463 mmHeight1429 mm
1579 KgWeight1534 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Taurus and 1995 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…