1995 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 (147 Hp) 1995Overall Score65.25/100
1995 Ford Taurus vs 1995 Chevrolet Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Chevrolet
Omega
Chevrolet Omega 3.0 i (165 Hp) 1995Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationChevrolet Omega
FordMakeChevrolet
TaurusModelOmega
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationChevrolet Omega
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2969 cc
147 HPPower165 HP
230 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationChevrolet Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationChevrolet Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationChevrolet Omega
5070 mmLength4768 mm
1854 mmWidth1760 mm
1463 mmHeight1454 mm
1579 KgWeight1497 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Ford Taurus and 1995 Chevrolet Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…