DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Taurus vs 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Land Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeToyota
TaurusModelLand Cruiser
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
175 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2982 cc
145 HPPower125 HP
230 NmTorque295 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank90 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5016 mmLength4290 mm
1854 mmWidth1730 mm
1400 mmHeight1855 mm
1518 KgWeight1775 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2365 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Taurus and 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…