DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Carnival vs 1999 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeFord
CarnivalModelTaurus
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

17,3 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
168 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2902 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
126 HPPower145 HP
338 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank61 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4890 mmLength5016 mm
1900 mmWidth1854 mm
1730 mmHeight1400 mm
1880 KgWeight1518 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Carnival and 1999 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…