DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Taurus vs 2000 Kia Carnival Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeKia
TaurusModelCarnival
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h17,3 s
175 km/hTop speed168 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2902 cc
145 HPPower126 HP
230 NmTorque338 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption12 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5016 mmLength4890 mm
1854 mmWidth1900 mm
1400 mmHeight1730 mm
1518 KgWeight1880 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Taurus and 2000 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…