DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Taurus vs 1996 Nissan Patrol Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
TaurusModelPatrol
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors—

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2826 cc
145 HPPower116 HP
230 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank0 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

5016 mmLength—
1854 mmWidth—
1400 mmHeight—
1518 KgWeight—
2756 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Taurus and 1996 Nissan Patrol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…