DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Frontera vs 1996 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
FronteraModelTaurus
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
147 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
113 HPPower145 HP
260 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption13,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
16 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4192 mmLength5016 mm
1780 mmWidth1854 mm
1721 mmHeight1400 mm
1828 KgWeight1518 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Frontera and 1996 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…