DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Taurus vs 1996 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
TaurusModelFrontera
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
175 km/hTop speed147 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
145 HPPower113 HP
230 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption16 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5016 mmLength4192 mm
1854 mmWidth1780 mm
1400 mmHeight1721 mm
1518 KgWeight1828 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Taurus and 1996 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…