DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Ford Taurus vs 1986 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford TaurusSpecificationAudi 100
FordMakeAudi
TaurusModel100
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Ford TaurusSpecificationAudi 100
—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2226 cc
106 HPPower115 HP
176 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Ford TaurusSpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford TaurusSpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford TaurusSpecificationAudi 100
4785 mmLength4793 mm
1796 mmWidth1814 mm
1387 mmHeight1422 mm
1389 KgWeight1290 Kg
2692 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Ford Taurus and 1986 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…