DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi 100 vs 1986 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationFord Taurus
AudiMakeFord
100ModelTaurus
1986Model year1986
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationFord Taurus
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
115 HPPower106 HP
165 NmTorque176 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationFord Taurus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationFord Taurus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size205/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationFord Taurus
4793 mmLength4785 mm
1814 mmWidth1796 mm
1422 mmHeight1387 mm
1290 KgWeight1389 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2692 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi 100 and 1986 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…