DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Taurus vs 2016 Chevrolet Impala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Impala

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.

75.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChevrolet
TaurusModelImpala
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement3556 cc
240 HPPower260 HP
366 NmTorque335 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol / CNG
72 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 SelectShiftGears6
255/45 R19Tyre size235/50 R18; 245/45 R19; 245/40 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5154 mmLength5113 mm
1935 mmWidth1854 mm
1542 mmHeight1496 mm
1798 KgWeight1894 Kg
2868 mmWheelbase2837 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Taurus and 2016 Chevrolet Impala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Impala leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…