2004 • Ford
Sport Trac
Ford Sport Trac 4.0 L V6 (210 HP) 2004Overall Score70.75/100
2004 Ford Sport Trac vs 2007 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.0 i V6 12V (212 Hp) 2007Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford Sport TracSpecificationFord Mustang
FordMakeFord
Sport TracModelMustang
2004Model year2007
—Body typeCabriolet
—Seats4
—Doors2
Performance
Ford Sport TracSpecificationFord Mustang
—0–100 km/h7,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement4009 cc
213 HPPower212 HP
339 NmTorque325 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford Sport TracSpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford Sport TracSpecificationFord Mustang
—Length4765 mm
—Width1877 mm
—Height1415 mm
—Weight1625 Kg
—Wheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford Sport Trac and 2007 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSFord Explorer vs Ford Sport Trac2005 and 2004 model years
VSFord Mustang vs Ford Sport Trac2005 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSFord F-150 vs Ford Sport Trac2005 and 2004 model years
VSChevrolet Astro vs Ford Sport Trac2004 and 2004 model years
VSChrysler Town & Country vs Ford Sport Trac2005 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…