DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Sport Trac vs 2008 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
Sport TracModelExplorer
2004Model year2008
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed158 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3998 cc
213 HPPower212 HP
339 NmTorque344 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4813 mm
—Width1832 mm
—Height1814 mm
—Weight1995 Kg
—Wheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Sport Trac and 2008 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…