2005 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 2005Overall Score73.75/100
2005 Ford Ranger vs 2004 Buick LaCrosse Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Buick
LaCrosse
Buick LaCrosse 3.8 i V6 (203 Hp) 2004Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Buick LaCrosse
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationBuick LaCrosse
FordMakeBuick
RangerModelLaCrosse
2005Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationBuick LaCrosse
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
207 HPPower203 HP
323 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationBuick LaCrosse
PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationBuick LaCrosse
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationBuick LaCrosse
4763 mmLength5030 mm
1763 mmWidth1855 mm
1648 mmHeight1460 mm
1399 KgWeight1585 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2805 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Ford Ranger and 2004 Buick LaCrosse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick LaCrosse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…