DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Mustang vs 2005 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
MustangModelRanger
2004Model year2005
CoupeBody typePick-up
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4009 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
205 HPPower207 HP
319 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank95 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4763 mm
1875 mmWidth1763 mm
1385 mmHeight1648 mm
1495 KgWeight1399 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Mustang and 2005 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…