2001 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 2001Overall Score70.75/100
2001 Ford Ranger vs 1999 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mercury
Mountaineer
Mercury Mountaineer 4.0 i V6 AWD (210 Hp) 1999Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMercury Mountaineer
FordMakeMercury
RangerModelMountaineer
2001Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats7
2Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMercury Mountaineer
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
207 HPPower210 HP
323 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMercury Mountaineer
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size245/75 R16 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMercury Mountaineer
4763 mmLength4844 mm
1763 mmWidth1831 mm
1648 mmHeight1806 mm
1399 KgWeight2000 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Ford Ranger and 1999 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSChevrolet Astro vs Ford Ranger2001 and 2001 model years
VSFord Explorer vs Ford Ranger2001 and 2001 model yearsImage unavailableVSMazda B-series vs Ford Ranger1999 and 2001 model yearsVSMercury Mountaineer vs Ford Ranger1999 and 2001 model years
VSFord Econoline vs Ford Ranger1999 and 2001 model yearsComments are loading…