1999 • Mercury
Mountaineer
Mercury Mountaineer 4.0 i V6 AWD (210 Hp) 1999Overall Score69.75/100
1999 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2001 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 2001Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury MountaineerSpecificationFord Ranger
MercuryMakeFord
MountaineerModelRanger
1999Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
7Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Mercury MountaineerSpecificationFord Ranger
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
210 HPPower207 HP
346 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury MountaineerSpecificationFord Ranger
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/75 R16 STyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury MountaineerSpecificationFord Ranger
4844 mmLength4763 mm
1831 mmWidth1763 mm
1806 mmHeight1648 mm
2000 KgWeight1399 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mercury Mountaineer and 2001 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSMercury Mountaineer vs Mercury Mountaineer2000 and 1999 model years
VSFord Econoline vs Mercury Mountaineer1999 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSMazda B-series vs Mercury Mountaineer2000 and 1999 model years
VSChevrolet Blazer vs Mercury Mountaineer1999 and 1999 model years
VSChevrolet Astro vs Mercury Mountaineer1999 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…