DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Ford Ranger vs 1999 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
RangerModelEconoline
2001Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
4Seats8
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
207 HPPower197 HP
323 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank132 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4763 mmLength5382 mm
1763 mmWidth2014 mm
1648 mmHeight2050 mm
1399 KgWeight2370 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Ford Ranger and 1999 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…