2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score82.5/100
2016 Ford Ranger vs 2014 Audi A6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Audi
A6
Audi A6 3.0 TDI V6 (204 Hp) 2014Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A6
FordMakeAudi
RangerModelA6
2016Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A6
—0–100 km/h7,5 s
175 km/hTop speed223 km/h
3198 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
200 HPPower204 HP
470 NmTorque450 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A6
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears7 S tronic
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size235/55 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A6
5277-5354 mmLength4938 mm
1860 mmWidth1898 mm
1815 mmHeight1452-1534 mm
1883 KgWeight1855 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2905 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Ranger and 2014 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…