DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Ford Ranger vs 2015 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelPajero
2013Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
175 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3198 ccEngine displacement3200 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
470 NmTorque441 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank69 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5359 mmLength4385 mm
1850 mmWidth1875 mm
1815 mmHeight1870 mm
2073 KgWeight2273 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2545 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Ford Ranger and 2015 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…