DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 2013 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
PajeroModelRanger
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
180 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3200 ccEngine displacement3198 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
441 NmTorque470 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
69 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
265/60 R18Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4385 mmLength5359 mm
1875 mmWidth1850 mm
1870 mmHeight1815 mm
2273 KgWeight2073 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mitsubishi Pajero and 2013 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…