2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.0 TDCi (156 Hp) 2010Overall Score74.5/100
2010 Ford Ranger vs 2010 Volkswagen Amarok Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volkswagen
Amarok
Volkswagen Amarok 2.0 TDI (140 Hp) 2010Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 12 points.
74.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
FordMakeVolkswagen
RangerModelAmarok
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
—0–100 km/h12,9-13.3 s
170 km/hTop speed164 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
156 HPPower140 HP
380 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Amarok
5075 mmLength5254 mm
1805 mmWidth1944 mm
1745 mmHeight1834 mm
1802 KgWeight1861 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3095 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Ranger and 2010 Volkswagen Amarok approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 12 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…