2010 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 2.5 i 20V (200 Hp) 2010Overall Score73.75/100
2010 Ford Kuga vs 2010 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.0 TDCi (156 Hp) 2010Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationFord Ranger
FordMakeFord
KugaModelRanger
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationFord Ranger
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2523 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
200 HPPower156 HP
320 NmTorque380 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R17HTyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationFord Ranger
4443 mmLength5075 mm
1832 mmWidth1805 mm
1677 mmHeight1745 mm
1573 KgWeight1802 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Kuga and 2010 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…