2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.0 TDCi (156 Hp) 2010Overall Score74.5/100
2010 Ford Ranger vs 2010 Ford Kuga Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 2.5 i 20V (200 Hp) 2010Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Kuga
FordMakeFord
RangerModelKuga
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Kuga
—0–100 km/h8,2 s
170 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement2523 cc
156 HPPower200 HP
380 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption13,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Kuga
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/70 R16Tyre size235/55 R17H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Kuga
5075 mmLength4443 mm
1805 mmWidth1832 mm
1745 mmHeight1677 mm
1802 KgWeight1573 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Ranger and 2010 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…