2009 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2009Overall Score67.75/100
2009 Ford Ranger vs 2009 Toyota 4runner Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Toyota
4runner
Toyota 4runner 2.7 16V (157 Hp) 2009Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Toyota 4runner
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota 4runner
FordMakeToyota
RangerModel4runner
2009Model year2009
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota 4runner
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2694 cc
143 HPPower157 HP
330 NmTorque241 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota 4runner
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption13,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt
—Average consumption11,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota 4runner
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size265/70 R17; 245/60 R20
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota 4runner
5075 mmLength4823 mm
1805 mmWidth1925 mm
1745 mmHeight1780-1816 mm
—Weight1948 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2789 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Ford Ranger and 2009 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…