DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Ranger vs 2003 Peugeot 607 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakePeugeot
RangerModel607
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
109 HPPower133 HP
266 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption9,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5020 mmLength4877 mm
1695 mmWidth1800 mm
1750 mmHeight1437 mm
1399 KgWeight1610 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Ranger and 2003 Peugeot 607 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…