2003 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (109 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
2003 Ford Ranger vs 2003 Nissan X-Trail Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Nissan
X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail 2.5i 16V (165 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Nissan X-Trail
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan X-Trail
FordMakeNissan
RangerModelX-Trail
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan X-Trail
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
109 HPPower165 HP
266 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan X-Trail
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan X-Trail
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan X-Trail
5020 mmLength4455 mm
1695 mmWidth1765 mm
1750 mmHeight1675 mm
1399 KgWeight1470 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Ranger and 2003 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…