1999 • Mitsubishi
Delica
Mitsubishi Delica 2.4 (122 Hp) 1999Overall Score62.25/100
1999 Mitsubishi Delica vs 1999 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (109 Hp) 1999Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Delica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi DelicaSpecificationFord Ranger
MitsubishiMakeFord
DelicaModelRanger
1999Model year1999
MinivanBody typePick-up
8Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mitsubishi DelicaSpecificationFord Ranger
150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2350 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
122 HPPower109 HP
190 NmTorque266 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi DelicaSpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R14Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi DelicaSpecificationFord Ranger
4655 mmLength5020 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1960 mmHeight1750 mm
1660 KgWeight1399 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mitsubishi Delica and 1999 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Delica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSFiat Marea vs Mitsubishi Delica1999 and 1999 model years
VSJeep Cherokee vs Mitsubishi Delica1999 and 1999 model years
VSToyota Estima vs Mitsubishi Delica1999 and 1999 model years
VSToyota Hiace vs Mitsubishi Delica1999 and 1999 model years
VSToyota Regius vs Mitsubishi Delica1999 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…