DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2017 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
OutlanderModelRanger
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
150 HPPower166 HP
380 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength5277-5354 mm
1810 mmWidth1860 mm
1680 mmHeight1703 mm
1600 KgWeight1670 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2017 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…