2017 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 (166 Hp) 2017Overall Score70.5/100
2017 Ford Ranger vs 2017 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Mitsubishi
Outlander
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.2 DI-D (150 Hp) 2017Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Outlander
FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelOutlander
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Outlander
—0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
166 HPPower150 HP
226 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Outlander
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Outlander
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Outlander
5277-5354 mmLength4695 mm
1860 mmWidth1810 mm
1703 mmHeight1680 mm
1670 KgWeight1600 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Ford Ranger and 2017 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…