2013 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 (166 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Ford Ranger vs 2013 Mazda 6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
FordMakeMazda
RangerModel6
2013Model year2013
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
175 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
166 HPPower163 HP
226 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank64 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
5359 mmLength4765 mm
1850 mmWidth1795 mm
1815 mmHeight1490 mm
2048 KgWeight1575 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Ford Ranger and 2013 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…