2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.3 (143 Hp) 2010Overall Score65.5/100
2010 Ford Ranger vs 2010 Volkswagen Eos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volkswagen
Eos
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TDI (140 Hp) 2010Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
FordMakeVolkswagen
RangerModelEos
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
—0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed207 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
143 HPPower140 HP
209 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size215/55 R16; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationVolkswagen Eos
5075 mmLength4423 mm
1805 mmWidth1791 mm
1745 mmHeight1444 mm
—Weight1592 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2578 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Ranger and 2010 Volkswagen Eos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…