DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Skoda Superb vs 2010 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeFord
SuperbModelRanger
2010Model year2010
LiftbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
140 HPPower143 HP
320 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16; 225/45 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength5075 mm
1817 mmWidth1805 mm
1462 mmHeight1745 mm
1547 KgWeight—
2761 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Skoda Superb and 2010 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…