DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Ford Ranger vs 2009 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCitroen
RangerModelC5
2009Model year2009
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,6 s
0 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
143 HPPower140 HP
209 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank71 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4779 mm
1805 mmWidth1860 mm
1745 mmHeight1451-1458 mm
—Weight1608 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Ford Ranger and 2009 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…