2009 • Citroen
C5
Citroen C5 2.0 HDi (140 Hp) 2009Overall Score64.75/100
2009 Citroen C5 vs 2009 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.3 (143 Hp) 2009Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen C5SpecificationFord Ranger
CitroenMakeFord
C5ModelRanger
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Citroen C5SpecificationFord Ranger
11,6 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
140 HPPower143 HP
320 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen C5SpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen C5SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen C5SpecificationFord Ranger
4779 mmLength5075 mm
1860 mmWidth1805 mm
1451-1458 mmHeight1745 mm
1608 KgWeight—
2815 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Citroen C5 and 2009 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…