2014 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (150 Hp) 2014Overall Score65.5/100
2014 Ford Ranger vs 2014 Skoda Superb Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Skoda
Superb
Skoda Superb 2.0 TDI (140 Hp) 2014Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationSkoda Superb
FordMakeSkoda
RangerModelSuperb
2014Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeLiftback
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationSkoda Superb
12,3 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
175 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
375 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationSkoda Superb
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationSkoda Superb
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationSkoda Superb
5359 mmLength4833 mm
1850 mmWidth1817 mm
1815 mmHeight1462 mm
2048 KgWeight1554 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2761 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Ford Ranger and 2014 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…