2014 • Skoda
Superb
Skoda Superb 2.0 TDI (140 Hp) 2014Overall Score64.75/100
2014 Skoda Superb vs 2014 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (150 Hp) 2014Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda SuperbSpecificationFord Ranger
SkodaMakeFord
SuperbModelRanger
2014Model year2014
LiftbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Skoda SuperbSpecificationFord Ranger
10,3 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
210 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque375 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda SuperbSpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda SuperbSpecificationFord Ranger
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda SuperbSpecificationFord Ranger
4833 mmLength5359 mm
1817 mmWidth1850 mm
1462 mmHeight1815 mm
1554 KgWeight2048 Kg
2761 mmWheelbase3220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Skoda Superb and 2014 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…