2012 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
2012 Ford Ranger vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo C30
FordMakeVolvo
RangerModelC30
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo C30
12,3 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
375 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo C30
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo C30
5359 mmLength4266 mm
1850 mmWidth1782 mm
1815 mmHeight1447 mm
2048 KgWeight1450 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Ranger and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…