2012 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
2012 Ford Ranger vs 2012 Great Wall Cowry Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Great Wall
Cowry
Great Wall Cowry 2.0 (143 Hp) 2012Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Great Wall Cowry
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
FordMakeGreat Wall
RangerModelCowry
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
12,3 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
375 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,5 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
5359 mmLength4574 mm
1850 mmWidth1704 mm
1815 mmHeight1845 mm
2048 KgWeight1510 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2825 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Ranger and 2012 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…